Study Documents Risks, Benefits of Dog Spay and Neuter

Spayed and neutered dogs live an average of 1.5 years longer than intact dogs but were more prone to cancer, a University of Georgia survey discovers.

Boston TerrierSpaying or neutering is common in the United States before age 1 as a means of controlling both the dog population and unwanted behaviors. About 78 percent of pet dogs are sterilized, according to the American Pet Products Association.

The American Veterinary Medical Association supports the spaying and neutering of dogs and cats as a population control.

According to University of Georgia researchers, sterilized dogs live longer but are more likely to die from cancer.

The study, published Wednesday in the online peer-reviewed journal PLOS ONE, found that intact dogs—those that are not spayed or neutered—lived an average of 7.9 years, compared to 9.4 years for sterilized dogs. The discovery was based on a sample of 40,139 death records contained in the Veterinary Medical Database, a collection generated by North American veterinary medical colleges.

“There is a long tradition of research into the cost of reproduction, and what has been shown across species is if you reproduce, you don’t live as long,” says Kate Creevy, DVM, MS, Dipl. ACVIM, an assistant professor at Georgia’s College of Veterinary Medicine. “The question that raises is, why would you die younger if you have offspring?”

The researchers learned that spayed and neutered dogs were more likely to die from cancer or autoimmune diseases. Intact dogs were more likely to die from infectious disease or trauma.

“Intact dogs are still dying from cancer; it is just a more common cause of death for those that are sterilized,” says Jessica Hoffman, a Georgia doctoral candidate who co-authored the study.

The types of cancers documented in the sample puzzled the researchers.

“It is not clear why the frequency of some cancers outside the reproductive system, including lymphoma and osteosarcoma, is influenced by sterilization, while the frequency of others, such as melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma, is not,” they wrote.

Reproductive hormones, particularly progesterone and testosterone, may suppress the immune system, Creevy says.

“There are a few studies of people who are sterilized, specifically among men who are castrated for cultural or medical reasons,” she said. “Interestingly, there was a difference in their life spans, too, and the castrated men tended to live longer. The men in that study who were not sterilized also got more infections, supporting the idea that there is a physiological reason for this.”

Previous studies that looked at the effects of reproduction on human survival rates showed mixed results, says Daniel Promislow, Ph.D., a Georgia genetics professor and co-author.

“Our findings suggest that we might get a clearer sense of potential costs of reproduction if we focus on how reproduction affects actual causes of mortality rather than its effect on life span,” he says.

Dog owners should take note of the study, Creevy adds.

“Our study tells pet owners that, overall, sterilized dogs will live longer, which is good to know,” she says. “Also, if you are going to sterilize your dog, you should be aware of possible risks of immune-mediated diseases and cancer; and if you are going to keep him or her intact, you need to keep your eye out for trauma and infection.”

The authors noted that the average life span reported in the study is likely lower than that in the canine population at large. The database sample was based on dogs referred to a veterinary teaching hospital.

They also used statistical formulas to adjust for the increased likelihood of disease in older animals.

“The overall average life span is likely shorter than what we would observe in private practice … but the difference in life span between sterilized and intact is real,” Creevy says. “The proportionate effects on causes of death are translatable to the global dog population, and it will be interesting to see if explanations for these effects can be found in future studies.”

Compared with other pets, dogs were the right choice for the study, Creevy says.

“There is no other species where we can even begin to study cause of death as closely as we do with dogs,” she states. “They model our own disease risk because they live in our homes, sleep in our beds and eat our food. All of the things that impact us and our health impact them.”


Article Categories: